Sunday, 29 June 2014

Porirua hospital museum visit...






'Porirua', like Carrington, Tokenui, Kingseat, is still associated with the stigma of mental illness. Our guide through the museum gave us plenty of examples from his long and enthusiastic memories of this place.
The only remaining original building from the old Porirua Mental Asylum is the remains of 'F' block which was where all the 'hopeless' cases were put. Built much earlier than Kingseat (c1914) and also because of it's purpose, this was much cruder architecture but had some staged rooms with old artifacts which was what I was after.
Our guide had especially opened the museum for me that day and this is obviously his passion, sharing memories of the old hospital and its history. We couldn't quite figure out (and didn't want to ask) what his association was but in the end his stories were too detailed not to have been either a doctor or nurse at the hospital...or perhaps a close association with a patient there.

Some interesting details:

  • double and triple locking was not quite what we thought
  • ECT treatment machines
  • pumice lining
  • the bath
  • the secure bedroom peep holes, similar to Carrington

Thursday, 19 June 2014

thesis: what I need to do...


  1. think about title & start reworking an introduction: include a discussion about the use of the word 'placebo'; define the boundaries of my thesis, that is, what I will and won't cover and discuss, the context, the fact that it isn't scientific (not a scientific-like study of the effects of this architecture)
  2. design something! so that we have something to build on...stop procrastinating
    • include bold architectural elements, don't just fiddle about with details
    • the design is not intended to be a 'good design', rather it should be something that supports my thesis or provocation completely
    • alternate between the top and bottom levels to keep things fresh
    • at the same time as designing also write short thought experiments and/or graphic novel like strips to explain how the place might make you feel, the intention behind the design
  3. drawings will not convey my ideas well so use narratives/stories instead, 'thought experiments'
    • narratives, stories, descriptive text
    • look at Katherine Mansfield's style of writing (descriptive)
    • read the Janet Frame book...find snippets of text, quotes
    • perhaps include thought bubble-like bits next to plans/sections in the final presentation


'Thought Experiments'

Definition: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought_experiment

"...the process of employing imaginary situations to help us understand the way things really are (or, in the case of Herman Kahn’s "scenarios", understand something about something in the future). The understanding comes through reflection upon this imaginary situation. Thought experimentation is a priori, rather than an empirical process, in that the experiments are conducted within the imagination ("laboratory of the mind"), and never in fact."

Or, a better discussion of this concept can be found here:
Thought experiments are devices of the imagination used to investigate the nature of things. ... Thought experiments should be distinguished from thinking about experiments, from merely imagining any experiments to be conducted outside the imagination, and from psychological experiments with thoughts.
They should also be distinguished from counterfactual reasoning in general, as they seem to require an experimental element.

The primary philosophical challenge of thought experiments is simple: How can we learn about reality (if we can at all), just by thinking? More precisely, are there thought experiments that enable us to acquire new knowledge about the intended realm of investigation without new data? If so, where does the new information come from if not from direct contact with the realm of investigation under consideration?...

Historically their role is very close to the double one played by actual laboratory experiments and observations.
There is widespread agreement that thought experiments play a central role both in philosophy and in the natural sciences and general acceptance of the importance and enormous influence and value of some of the well-known thought experiments in the natural sciences, like Maxwell's demon, Einstein's elevator or Schrödinger's cat... Much of ethics, philosophy of language, and philosophy of mind is based firmly on the results of thought experiments as well, including Searle's Chinese room or Putnam's twin earth. Philosophy, even more than the sciences, would be severely impoverished without thought experiments, which suggests that a unified theory of thought experiments is desirable to account for them in both the sciences and the humanities. There have been attempts to define “thought experiment”, but likely it will be better to leave the term loosely characterized, so as not to prejudice the investigation. Many of the most important concepts we deal with are like this, e.g., religion or democracy.

Try using this concept in my thesis as a way of exploring the design outcomes.

See this interactive example...be aware though that this one is about your views on abortion.

So, for my thesis...


  • describe the experience of walking into a (badly designed) modern hospital room, then contrast this with a description of (1) an historical hospital room (2) a home - these descriptions will include sounds, smells, and texture/touch as well as what they look like
  • then pose the question about the likely things you're feeling in each scenario under certain circumstances - which is better, why? - how do certain elements compound this feeling? (or contradict it)
  • create different personas to help explain this, eg. create a person with a set of memories (past events, places they felt safe in etc, the smells etc associated with these places)

Monday, 16 June 2014

Placebo versus Reassurance....

I was thinking of using 'architectural placebo' somewhere in my thesis title but have been having second thoughts about this. While it's a nice phrase, I'm very aware of the fact that many people associate 'placebo' with a fake or sham, perhaps something slightly underhand or having 'snake oil' connotations.

A placebo is by definition a neutral stimulus with no therapeutic effects...

However, the environment does have a therapeutic effect on mental health.

My use of the term is associated with my knowledge that the placebo effect, in medicine, is a very real effect acknowledged by the medical profession and specifically accounted for when conducting placebo controlled trials of 'real' medication.

However, the alternatives sound kind of boring - something along the lines of
  • environmental effects on psychological wellbeing
  • environmental therapy, architectural therapy, healing architecture (ugh!, too 70's), 
  • The Architecture of Reassurance - that's probably a better phrase
I also want something that sounds scientific but also quirky or unexpected so you're not presented with something that you may have an immediate reaction to (eg. negative preconceived ideas about). Unfortunately there's nothing particularly 'quirky' about reassurance. You hear the word, you immediately know what it means, there's no thinking about it, wondering..
  • reassurance = comfort, support, faith, hope, (insurance?), solace
  • reassurance = to restore confidence,
  • the architecture = health insurance
  • environmental health insurance
  • architectural health insurance
  • investment in this will reduce the risk of ill health




Monday, 9 June 2014

Barry White Workshop...

Barry White sure knows his soul but what about thesis writing?..Below are notes from the very good/useful/succinct/timely workshop taken by Dr W. Barry White (though the aforementioned may well have an honorary degree).

Illustrations - see book by Edward Tufte 'Beautiful Evidence' See his website: http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/

Thesis definition

  • an original proposition, statement or assertion advanced and maintained by argument
  • where it's not possible to  encapsulate the thesis in a title, it should be stated early in the text (eg. at the beginning of the introduction)
  • ideally expressed as a question - this provides a focus; state this question at the beginning
  • or a purpose statement instead of question

By writing down what your thesis is not about, you can more easily draft  a statement of what it is about. Far easier to disprove something than to prove it. The null hypothesis.

Vocabulary

Use appropriate vocabulary. Science - investigates, Humanities (architecture) - explores
Can use language which hedges (eg. the example of the DNA discovery) eg. 'appears to' 'suggests' etc 

Systematic arguments (usually only applies in science) versus Inductive arguments (sound or unsound) - 'likely' 'possible' etc

  • eg. inductive - you are human; most humans eat fish; therefore you are likely to eat fish OR you are human; some humans eat prawns; therefore it is possible that you eat prawns

Title

Concept: Specific boundaries
Eg. 'The rhetoric of adolescent fiction: the pedagogy of reading practices in south…etc…
Or
Concept … Specific boundaries
Make sure you always have a title - this will most probably change over time
Examiner will want to see your title concepts defined - the focus

The title should assist examiners to understand what your intention is. Thus, all terms used in the title should be defined early on.

Introduction

Delimitations - define the limits of your research (chapter one). 
Likewise, the key concepts need to be defined early (eg. what is meant by architectural placebo, phenomenological etc)

The introduction sets the tone of the thesis - be assertive in the purpose statement at the start.

Purpose statement
Explanation about what is to come next
Then indicate the topic area and emphasise its current or future importance/relevance (why am I doing this?)*
Provide definitions of terms and phrases as used in the thesis, as required (eg. architectural placebo,  salutogenics, my interpretation of these phrases)


  • What are the origins of my research?
  • *Why is this research important?
  • What are the major issues and debates around the topic?
  • What are the key concepts, theories and ideas?
Generally, the introduction could use the following format:

  1. Purpose of the research
  2. Structure of this chapter
  3. Theoretical framework
  4. Definition of terms
  5. Context
  6. Focus of the research
  7. Significance of the research
  8. Structure of the thesis (then including sections outlining what is in each chapter)
The relationship between the introduction and the conclusion is close - all the questions and issues raised in the introduction will need to be addressed in the conclusion.



Structure - general

  • Metatext, to make the writing reader friendly by providing explanations of text to follow, how it's going to be structured etc
  • Chapters - very flexible - make up each chapter as relevant, but explain why this structure is appropriate
  • Be careful not to overquote. Try to incorporate into your own sentences. Also, be discriminating about what references you use and/or put things like 'see for a good example, …'
Conclusion

Rather than 'wrap things up', good conclusions 'open things up'. 'join the conversation' about this topic NB. Summary versus conclusion (these are different)



Examiners are looking for your unique insight - the indeterminate qualities 

Monday, 2 June 2014

De Hogewey & 'reminiscence therapy'

See these links for an elderly nursing home with a difference - each area is designed slightly differently depending on the backgrounds of the residents. They put those with other like-minded people of similar backgrounds and experiences to live closely together.
http://www.detail-online.com/architecture/news/dementia-village-de-hogeweyk-in-weesp-019624.html
1. extended boulevard, 2. pond park, 3. theatre square, 4. boulevard, 5. passage, 6. green square, 7. large square, 8. eastern corner

They share bungalows - in groups of 6, 7, or 8 with others who share their interests.